Pornography is
broadly defined as written or visual material that stimulates
sexual feelings whose primary purpose is to arouse the observer
or reader. It is also referred to as porn, smut and obscene
material.
The term "pornography"
comes from porneia, the Greek word for prostitute, and means
"the writings of and about prostitutes".
Defining the
type of material that qualifies as pornography is more difficult.
It is a relative term, subject to interpretation based on
people's opinions. Standards of obscenity have been defined
legally in a consistent way.
Technically,
pornography is not illegal. Sexually explicit material that
is judged in violation of the penal code is defined as obscene.
These works are often called "hard core pornography",
but even that is not illegal unless tested by the courts
and found to be obscene.
The U.S. Supreme
Court arrived at a definition of obscenity in the 1957 case
of Roth vs. United States, and a number of lower courts
have added their definitions since.
Defining Erotic
Material
Broadly speaking, erotic material is legally obscene if,
for the average person:
Its predominant
appeal is to a prurient interest in sex
It is contrary to the contemporary standards of the community
It is without social value, or judged to be without artistic,
literary, or scientific value
These standards may be helpful to an extent, but they are
extremely difficult to apply in any objective way.
For one thing,
standards vary from community to community and judgments
about the artistic or literary value of material cannot
be made by the use of a simple formula.
Whereas hard
core pornography is understood to be strictly for commercial
use, with no pretense to artistic merit, works of art are
sometimes claimed to be obscene despite the defense of artistic
value.
Pornography and
Sex Crimes
Much of the controversy surrounding pornography is related
to society's concern about how pornography affects people.
One common worry is that the use of pornography promotes
sex crimes and that sex offenders are avid consumers of
obscene material.
Research, however,
does not show any consistent pattern. Data from studies
conducted in the 1970s and 1980s have consistently shown
that the use of pornography is not related to an increase
in sex crimes and that sex offenders in general have had
significantly less exposure to pornography than non-offenders.
Some later work in this area has not agreed with these earlier
findings.
Another popular
belief is that only perverted individuals would be interested
in pornography. Findings from the historic Kinsey study
showed that between 14 and 60 percent of females and between
36 and 77 percent of males were stimulated by viewing sexy
movies, reading and hearing erotic stories, and viewing
pictures, drawings or other portrayals of sexual activity.
The Redbook survey (1974) reported that 60 percent of the
100,000 married women they surveyed had seen a pornographic
movie, and 42 percent of these women had used pornography
in their sexual practices at least occasionally.
When the magazine
Psychology Today asked 20,000 readers whether they had ever
used erotic material for arousal, 92 percent of the male
respondents and 72 percent of the females reported that
they had.
Erotic Materials
Widely Used
In 1970, the U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography
conducted one of the few scientific interviews of adults
in the U.S. regarding pornography. Eighty-four percent of
the men and 69 percent of the women indicated that they
had used such material at some time.
Finally, the
tremendous popularity of magazines such as Playboy, Penthouse
and Hustler provides undeniable testimony to the widespread
use of erotica.
Furthermore,
the U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography reported
that ordinary people did not change their types of sexual
practice or values about what was acceptable as a result
of viewing pornography.
It also reported
that there was a general increase in sexual activity within
the 24-hour period after viewing pornography, but it was
generally with the regular partner, or in the case of those
without a partner, masturbation.
It is noteworthy,
however, that neither the Commission nor the authors of
the other studies observed the effects of continuing exposure
to pornography over a period of years. Thus it is not known
what, if any, differences would be evidenced in the long
run.
Exploiting Women
Another important concern about pornography is that some
types portray women in a degrading, dehumanizing and exploitive
manner. And, in fact, men are done a disservice when they
are portrayed as interested only in sex (the more unusual
the better), always ready for sex (with extraordinary anatomy
and endurance), but incapable of sensitivity and tenderness.
Some men may
not object to this characterization, but most women do not
appreciate the way some pornography depicts their gender
as objects serving men.
Perhaps one reason
why some pornography exploits women is because, throughout
history, it has mainly been created by men for men. Erotic
works from the Stone Age on reveal typical male sexual interests
and fantasies, and depict various interpretations of the
idealized woman.
It is principally
for this reason that pornography has been assumed to arouse
women less than it does men. But with the contemporary phenomenon
of women creating pornography, the question arose of whether
men and women respond differently to pornographic material.
Male/Female Response
to Pornography Comparable
Kinsey speculated that there could be some neurophysiological
reason for a difference, but a West German research team
studied the responses of men and women to pornography and
found them to be comparable emotionally, physically and
behaviorally.
Psychologist
Julia Heiman's work found that there are both sex differences
and other differences in responses, but women are not inherently
less capable of responding to pornography. Women and men,
she found, respond more to that which they like.
As with many
issues, our society is not in agreement about the topic
of pornography. Pornography is mass produced and widely
available, yet is just as widely distrusted and condemned.
We have laws against obscenity but cannot define it. We
believe that somehow pornography is harmful, yet can find
no evidence of harm.
On the one hand,
our culture seems unable to satisfy its demand for pornography;
on the other hand, many people believe it should be controlled
in some way for the general good. It would most likely require
a major cultural shift for society to feel comfortable about
repealing all legislation against pornography. Equally,
it would take as large a shift to enforce total prohibition.
Ultimately, it is an individual's personal beliefs that
determine what is acceptable and what is obscene.